It is simple enough to say that since book

题型:单项选择题

问题:

It is simple enough to say that since books have classes -- fiction, biography, poetry -- we should separate them and take from each what it is right and what should give us. Yet few people ask from books what can give us. Most commonly we come to books with blurred and divided minds, asking of fiction that it shall be true, of poetry that it shall be false, of biography that it shall be flattering, of history that it shall enforce our own prejudices. If we could banish all such preconception when we read, that would be an admirable beginning. Do not dictate to your author; try to become him. Be his fellow-worker and accomplice. If you hang back, and reserve and criticize at first, you are preventing yourself from getting the fullest possible value from what you read. But if you open your mind as widely as possible, then signs and hints of almost imperceptible fineness, from the twist and turn of the first sentences, will bring you into the presence of a human being unlike any other. Steep yourself in this, acquaint yourself with this, and soon you will find that your author is giving you, or attempting to give you, something far more definite. The 32 chapters of a novel -- if we consider how to read a novel first -- are an attempt to make something as formed and controlled as a building: but words are more impalpable than bricks; reading is a longer and more complicated process than seeing. Perhaps the quickest way to understand the elements of what a novelist is doing is not to read, but to write; to make your own experiment with the dangers and difficulties of words. Recall, then, some event that has left a distinct impression on you -- how at the comer of the street, perhaps, you passed two people talking. A tree shock; an electric light danced; the tone of the talk was comic, but also tragic; a whole vision, an entire conception, seemed contained in that moment.
But when you attempt to reconstruct it in words, you will find that it breaks into a thousand conflicting impressions. Some must be subdued; others emphasized; in the process you will lose, probably, all grasp upon the emotion itself. Then turn from your blurred and littered pages to the opening pages of some great novelist -- Defoe, Jane Austen, Hardy. Now you will be better able to appreciate their mastery. It is not merely that we are in the presence of a different person -- Defoe, Jane Austen, or Thomas Hardy -- but that we are living in a different world. Here, in Robinson Crusoe, we are trudging a plain high road; one thing happens after another; the fact and the order of the fact is enough. But if the open air and adventure mean everything to Defoe, they mean nothing to Jane Austen. Here is the drawing-room, and people talking, and by the many mirrors of their talk revealing their characters. And if, when we have accustomed ourselves to the drawing-room and its reflections, we turn to Hardy, we are once more spun around. The moors are round us and the stars are above our heads. The other side of the mind is now exposed -- the dark side that comes uppermost in solitude, not the light side that shows in company. Our relations are not towards people, but towards Nature and destiny. Yet different as these worlds are, each is consistent with itself. The maker of each is careful to observe the laws of his own perspective, and however great a strain they may put upon, they will never confuse us, as lesser writers so frequently do, by introducing two different kinds of reality into the same book. Thus to go from one great novelist to another -- from Jane Austen to Hardy, from Peacock to Trollope, from Scott to Meredith -- is to be wrenched and uprooted; to be thrown this way and then that. To read a novel is a difficult and complex art. You must be capable not only of great fineness of perception, but of great boldness of imagination if you are going to make use of all that the novelist -- the great artist -- gives you.

In Paragraph 2, the author mentioned Defoe, Jane Austen and Hardy to show ______.

A. their mastery of writing novels
B. her admiration for them
C. they had different writing styles to reveal the world
D. her understanding about their works

考点:翻译专业资格考试翻译三级笔译(综合能力)翻译三级笔译综合能力
题型:单项选择题

数控编程在G73P(ns)Q(nf)U(Δu)W(Δw)S500程序格式中,()表示精加工路径的第一个程序段顺序号。

A.Δw

B.ns

C.Δu

D.nf

题型:单项选择题

片剂质量检查主要包括()

A.外观性状

B.硬度与脆碎度

C.溶出度

D.含量均匀度

E.崩解度

题型:单项选择题

(37分)书评能够反映重要人物的著作及其思想对历史进程的关键影响。阅读以下材料,回答问题。

材料一 西洋公学译书院新译亚当·斯密《国富论》。欧洲200年前理财政策多与中国相似,自此书出,英国首先采用,遂立今日富强之基。

——1900年12月27日中国《新闻报》

这是一本将经济学、哲学、历史、政治理论和实践计划奇怪地混合在一起的书,一本由有着高深学问和明敏见识的人所写的书。这个人有强大的分析能 力,能对他的笔记本中所有的材料进行筛选;又有强大的综合能力,能按照新的和引人注目的方式将其重新组合起来,斯密对他当时的学术领域的各种思想是极为敏 感的……在促成我们现代生活方式的许多因素之中,《国富论》这本书所发生的影响,可媲美任何一本现代的典籍。

——马克斯·勒纳

斯密(在书中)将演讲描述为从封建主义走向一个需要有新制度的社会阶段,这种新制度是由市场确定的而不是由同业公会确定的,是自由的而不是受 政府限制的。这在后来称为放任自由的资本主义,斯密称之为完全自由的制度。

——《国富论》译序

材料二 当凯恩斯于1946年去世时,英国《泰晤士报》为他所撰写的讣闻中说:“他是一位天才,而作为一位政治经济学者,他对专业人士和一般群众的思想都有着世界 范围的影响……要想找出一位能与之相比拟的经济学家,我们必须上溯到亚当·斯密。”

一位西方学者说:“凯恩斯是一个相信在必要时刻政府可以进行干预而不相信完全放任主义的人,他坚信要使经济周期上升,政府必须插足进来用减少 失业的方法来维持购买力,这意味着“赤字开支”,但它会恢复经济的平衡。事实上,这是“新政”已经在做的事,而凯恩斯用高度的技巧和理论的根据在他的名著 《就业,利息和货币通论》一书里加以阐释。”

材料三 金融危机是当下政府扩张的直接原因。政府投入亿万巨资救助银行,避免出现经济萧条。……政府权力增加,无论理由好坏,其不断膨胀的趋势必须扭转。

——英国《经济学人》2010年1月23日文章《大政府,止步》

(1)根据材料一,结合所学知识指出中国、西欧“200年前”各自对外政策。概括各评论者对《国富论》的基本认识。(10分)

(2)根据材料一、二及所学知识,古典自由主义和凯恩斯主义有哪些不同的经济观点。结合所学知识,简要分析观点不同的根源。(10分)

(3)结合材料二,并依据所学知识,综合分析凯恩斯主义产生的时代背景。(10分)

题型:单项选择题

电子采购合同与传统合同的区别有()

A.合同双方互不相见

B.简单交易无具体合同形式

C.数字签名方式

D.收件人主营地为合同成立地点

题型:单项选择题

根据《本地通信线路工程设计规范》,城市内架空线路的位置应有统一的走向,以减少和电力架空线路的交越。新线路网的建设应按照城市规划统一规定的管线走向位置或与城市建设部门和电业局洽定的走向设置。

更多题库