在正常使用条件下,建筑工程屋面防水工程、有防水要求的卫生间、房间和墙面的防渗漏的最低

题型:单项选择题

问题:

在正常使用条件下,建筑工程屋面防水工程、有防水要求的卫生间、房间和墙面的防渗漏的最低保修期限为( )。

A.2年

B.4年

C.5年

D.终身

考点:监理工程师(建设部)建设工程质量、投资、进度控制建设工程质量、投资、进度控制
题型:单项选择题

(3分)1991年,我国著名化学家张青莲教授与另一位科学家合作,测定了铟(In)元素的相对原子质量新值。铟原子的核电荷数为49,相对原子质量为115。计算:

(1)铟原子的质子数为      

(2)铟原子的核外电子数      

(3)铟原子的中子数       

题型:单项选择题

阅读下文,完成文后各题。

诗的境界是情趣与意象的融合,情趣是感受来的,起于自我的,可经历而不可描绘的;意象是观照得来的,起于外物的,有形象可描绘的。情趣是基层的生活经验,意象则起于对基层生活经验的反省。情趣如自我容貌,意象则如对镜自照。二者之中不但有差异而且有天然跨越的鸿沟。由主观的情趣如何能克服这鸿沟而达到可观的意象,是诗和其它艺术所必征服的困难。如略加思索,这困难终于被征服,真是一大奇迹。

尼采的《悲剧的诞生》可以说是这种困难的征服史。宇宙与人类生命,像叔本华所分析的,含有意志与意象两个要素。有意志即有需求,有情感,需求与情感为一切苦恼悲哀之源。人永远不能由自我与其所带生命意志中拔出,所以生命永远是一种痛苦。生命苦痛的救星即为意象。意象是意志的外化或对象化,有意象则人取得超然地位,凭高俯视意志的挣扎,恍然彻悟这幅光怪陆离的形相大可以娱目赏心。尼采根据书本华的这种悲观哲学,发挥为“由形相得解脱”之说,他用两个希腊神名来象征意志与意象的冲突。意志为酒神狄奥尼索斯,赋有时时刻刻都在蠢蠢欲动的活力与狂热,同时又感到变化无常的痛苦,于是沉一切痛苦于酣醉,酣醉于醇酒妇人,酣醉于狂歌曼舞。苦痛是狄奥尼索斯的基本精神,歌舞是狄奥尼索斯精神所表现的艺术。意象如日神阿波罗。凭高普照,世界一切事物藉他的光辉而显现形相,他怡然泰然地像做甜蜜梦似地在那里静观自得,一切“变化”在取得形相之中就注定成了“真如”(being)。静穆是阿波罗的基本精神,造型的绘画与雕像是阿波罗精神所表现的艺术。这两种精神本是绝对相反相冲突的,而希腊人的智慧却成就了打破了这冲突的奇迹。他们转移阿波罗的明镜来照临狄奥尼索斯的痛苦挣扎,于是意志外射于形象,痛苦赋形于庄严优美,结果乃有希腊悲剧的产生。悲剧是希腊人“由形相得解脱”的一条路径。人生世相充满着缺陷,灾祸,罪孽;从道德观点看,它是恶的;从艺术观点看,它可以是美的,悲剧是希腊人从艺术观点在缺陷灾祸中所看到的美形相。

——朱光潜:《诗论》

小题1:下列对本文的理解与分析,不正确的一项是(2分)(    )

A.叔本华认为人有了由意志外射或对象化而成的意象就可以取得超然的地位,就可以凭高俯视意志的挣扎。

B.尼采的“由形相得解脱”之说是在叔本华的悲观哲学的基础上发挥得出的。

C.苦痛是酒神的基本精神,静穆是日神的基本精神。希腊悲剧通过转移阿波罗的明镜来照临狄奥尼索斯的痛苦挣扎,于是意志外射于形象,痛苦赋形于庄严优美,由此可以看出在希腊人那里酒神精神是一种需要迫切摆脱的痛苦状态。

D.日神的光辉使万物呈现出美的外观。造型的绘画与雕塑是典型的日神艺术,希腊雕塑中的奥林匹斯众神形象就属于日神艺术。小题2:下列推断,不符合原文意思的一项是(2分) (     )

A.我们虽时时在情趣里过活,却很少能将情趣转化为诗,因为情趣是可比喻而不可直接描绘的实感,如果不附丽到具体的意象上去,就根本没有可见的形象。

B.诗人感受情趣之后,却能跳到旁边来,把它当作意象来观照玩索。

C.尼采指出了主观的情趣与客观的意象之间的隔阂与冲突,同时也说明了这种冲突的调和。

D.人的需求与情感是人一切苦恼悲哀的来源,所以人只要无欲无求,清心寡欲,即可消除掉苦恼和悲哀,达到一种圆融的境界。

题型:单项选择题

竞争就是人与人之间,鱼死网破的争夺。[ ]

题型:单项选择题

在一次足球“世界杯”比赛时,某运动员在比赛中为争夺头球不慎受伤昏迷,此时医护人员会及时赶去施救,其中一个医护人员会用自己的双臂从运动员双臂下穿过,并用双手抱住运动员的头部与他人一起小心将运动员平移到担架上,这样做的目的是(  )

A.可节省时间,不影响比赛

B.避免运动员的头颈部再次受到损伤

C.亲切的表现,体现了责任心

D.便于搬运和施救

题型:单项选择题

Americans are often contrasted with the rest of the world in terms of material possessions. We are accused of being materialistic, gadget crazy. And, as a matter of fact, we have developed material things for some very interesting reasons. Lacking a fixed class system and having all extremely mobile population, Americans have become highly sensitive to how others make use of material possessions. We use everything from clothes to houses as a highly evolved and complex means of ascertaining each other’s status. Ours is a rapidly shifting system in which both styles and people move up or down. For example:

The Cadillac (卡迪拉克) ad men feel that not only is it natural but quite insightful of them to show a picture of a Cadillac and a well-turned out gentleman in his early fifties opening the door. The caption (标题) underneath reads, "You already know a great deal about this man. "

Following this same pattern, the head of a big union spends an excess of $100, 000 furnishing his office so that the president of United States Steel cannot look down on him. Good materials, large space, and the proper surroundings signify that the people who occupy the premises (建筑物及其周围所属土地) are solid citizens, that they are dependable and successful.

The French, English, and the Germans have entirely different ways of using their material possessions. What stands for the height of dependability and respectability with the English would be old-fashioned and backward to us. The Japanese take pride in often inexpensive but tasteful arrangements that are used to produce the proper emotional setting.

Middle East businessmen look for something else-family, connections, friendship. They do not use the furnishings of their office as part of their status system; nor do they expect to impress a client by these means or to fool a banker into lending more money than he should. They like good things, too, but feel that they, as persons, should be known and not judged solely by what the public sees.

One of the most common criticisms of American relations abroad, both commercial and governmental, is that we usually think in terms of material things. "Money talks," says the American, who goes on talking the language of money abroad, in the belief that money talks the same language all over the world. A common practice in the United States is to try to buy loyalty with high salaries. In foreign countries, this maneuver almost never works, for money and material possessions stand for something different there from they do in America.

Americans are most commonly criticized for their ().

A. commercial relations abroad

B. governmental relations abroad

C. materialistic attitude toward their relations with other countries

D. lack of knowledge about other countries

更多题库