定向资产管理合同无效、被撤销、解除或者终止后()日内,证券公司应当代理客户向证券登记

题型:单项选择题

问题:

定向资产管理合同无效、被撤销、解除或者终止后()日内,证券公司应当代理客户向证券登记结算机构申请注销专用证券账户。

A.10

B.15

C.20

D.25

考点:证券从业证券市场基本法律法规综合练习证券市场基本法律法规综合练习题库
题型:单项选择题

心浊音界变小,甚至叩不出见于().

A.肺实变

B.胸腔积液

C.肺气肿

D.心包积液

E.腹腔积液

题型:单项选择题
任务型阅读 (共10小题;每小题1分,满分10分)
请认真阅读下列短文,并根据所读内容在文章后表格中的空格里填入一个最恰当的单词。
注意:每个空格只填1个单词。请将答案写在答题卡上相应题号的横线上。
Waste to Energy—JUST BURN IT!
WHY BURN WASTE?
Waste-to-energy plants generate (产生) enough electricity to supply 2.4 million households in the US. But, providing electricity is not the major advantage of waste-to-energy plants. In fact, it costs more to generate electricity at a waste-to-energy plant than it does at a coal, nuclear, or hydropower plant. 
The major advantage of burning waste is that it considerably reduces the amount of trash going to landfills. The average American produces more than 1,600 pounds of waste a year. If all this waste were landfilled, it would take more than two cubic yards of landfill space. That’s the volume of a box three feet long, three feet wide, and six feet high. If that waste were burned, the ashes would fit into a box three feet long, three feet wide, but only nine inches high!
Some communities in the Northeast may be running out of land for new landfills. And, since most people don’t want landfills in their backyards, it has become more difficult to obtain permits to build new landfills. Taking the country as a whole, the United States has plenty of open space, of course, but it is expensive to transport garbage a long distance to put it into a landfill.
TO BURN OR NOT TO BURN?
Some people are concerned that burning garbage may harm the environment. Like coal plants, waste-to-energy plants produce air pollution when the fuel is burned to produce steam or electricity. Burning garbage releases the chemicals and substances found in the waste. Some chemicals can be a threat to people, the environment, or both, if they are not properly controlled.
Some critics of waste-to-energy plants are afraid that burning waste will hamper (妨碍,阻碍) recycling programs. If everyone sends their trash to a waste-to-energy plant, they say, there will be little motive to recycle. Several states have considered or are considering banning waste-to-energy plants unless recycling programs are in place. Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York City have delayed new waste-to-energy plants, hoping to increase the level of recycling first.
So, what’s the real story? Can recycling and burning waste coexist? At first glance, recycling and waste-to-energy seem to be at odds (不一致), but they can actually complement (弥补) each other. That’s because it makes good sense to recycle some materials, and better sense to burn others.
Let’s look at aluminum, for example. Aluminum mineral is so expensive to mine that recycling aluminum more than pays for itself. Burning it produces no energy. So clearly, aluminum is valuable to recycle and not useful to burn.  
Paper, on the other hand, can either be burned or recycled—it all depends on the price the used paper will bring.
Plastics are another matter. Because plastics are made from petroleum and natural gas, they are excellent sources of energy for waste-to-energy plants. This is especially true since plastics are not as easy to recycle as steel, aluminum, or paper. Plastics almost always have to be hand sorted and making a product from recycled plastics may cost more than making it from new materials. 
To burn or not to burn is not really the question. We should use both recycling and waste-to-energy as alternatives to landfilling.
Waste to Energy—JUST BURN IT!
WHY BURN WASTE?
Advantages of waste to Energy
◆Though at a high (71) _______, waste-to-energy plants can produce enough electricity for 2.4 million US
households.
◆Burning waste can (72) _______ a considerable amount of trash going to landfills.
(73)_______ for landfilling
◆Some communities (74) _______ land for new landfills.
◆Most people refuse to build landfills around.
◆Building landfills in far-away areas will increase the cost of (75) _______ garbage.
TO BURN
OR NOT
TO BURN?
(76) __________ about burning garbage
◆Burning garbage releases chemicals, which, if not
properly controlled, can be (77) _______ to people and the environment.
◆Burning garbage will hamper recycling programs.
Coexistence of recycling and burning waste
Recycling and waste-to-energy can go well with each other in that some materials like aluminum are fit to recycle, while others like plastics are fit to (78) _______.
(79)__________
Whether to burn or not to burn, we should (80) _______ landfilling with both recycling and waste-to-energy to deal with garbage.
题型:单项选择题

皮肤、毛发的滋润程度与()有关。

A.皮肤肌层

B.表层基底层

C.皮脂膜

D.皮下脂肪层

题型:单项选择题

一组砼立方体抗压试件,其单块试件抗压强度值分别为:32.4MPa、27.1MPa、33.7MPa,则该组试件抗压强度值为()MPa。

A、31.1

B、32.4

C、27.1

D、试验结果无效

题型:单项选择题

除非护士职业的低工资和高度紧张的工作条件问题得到解决,否则护士学校就不能吸引到比目前数量更多的有才干的申请者。如果护士学校的有才干的申请者的数量不能超过目前的水平,那么要么这种职业必须降低它的进入标准,要么很快就会出现护士短缺的局面。然而,降低进入标准并不一定就能解决护士的不足。很明显,不管是护士不足还是降低这个职业的进入标准,目前高质量的健康护理都不能维持下去。 以下哪项可以从上述陈述中推出

A.如果解决了护士职业低工资和高度紧张的工作条件问题,那么它吸引到的有才干的申请者的数量就比目前多。

B.如果有才干的护士学校的申请者的数量不能超过目前的水平,那么护士职业就不得不降低它的进入标准。

C.如果解决了护士职业低工资和高度紧张的工作条件问题,那么高质量的健康护理就可以维持下去。

D.如果不解决护士职业低工资和高度紧张的工作条件问题,那么很快就会出现护士紧缺的局面。

E.如果不解决护士职业低工资和高度紧张的工作条件问题,那么目前的高质量的健康护理就不能维持下去。

更多题库