“牧童经济”是一个生动的比喻,使人们想起牧童在放牧时只顾放牧而不管草原的破坏。它

题型:选择题

问题:

“牧童经济”是一个生动的比喻,使人们想起牧童在放牧时只顾放牧而不管草原的破坏。它是英国著名的经济学家K·E·博尔丁提出的一种对自然界进行掠夺、破坏式的经济模式,其主要特点是指把地球看成一个取之不尽的资源宝库,进行无限度的索取,使自然生态遭到破坏,并造成大量废弃物,污染环境。据此完成1~2题。

1、下列恶果不是由“牧童经济”造成的是[ ]

A、沙尘暴加剧

B、农药污染

C、臭氧层空洞

D、破坏性地震

2、下列经济模式具有“牧童经济”特点的是[ ]

A、黄河出现凌汛

B、围湖造田,增产粮食

C、南水北调,解决北方水荒

D、黄土高原植树种草,防止水土流失

考点:主要环境问题的产生和表现
题型:选择题

最大自主通气量可用来评估()

A.胸廓弹性和呼吸肌的力量

B.肺总量

C.肺组织弹性

D.气道阻力

E.肺血流

题型:选择题

柏某是某律师事务所律师,其接受当事人的委托承担犯罪嫌疑人(被告人)可能要判处死刑的案件,其到法院可以不向侦查机关提交( )。

A.授权委托书

B.律师执业证

C.律师事务所介绍信

D.身份证件

题型:选择题

关于病人用药依从性,下列提法哪条准确( )。

A.能按照药品说明书用药

B.能听从护士用药指导

C.按医嘱服药,注意饮食和起居

D.能按医护人员和药品广告的指导用药

E.能遵守医师的治疗方案及服从医务人员对健康其他方面的指导

题型:选择题

If your preschoolers turn up their noses at carrots or celery, a small reward like a sticker for taking even a taste may help get them to eat previously disliked foods, a UK study said.

Though it might seem obvious that a reward could encourage young children to eat their vegetables, the idea is actually controversial, researchers wrote in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. That’s because some studies have shown that rewards can backfire and cause children to lose interest in foods they already liked, said Jane Wardle, a researcher at University College London who worked on the study. Verbal praise, such as “Brilliant! You’re a great vegetable taster,” did not work as well.

The study found t hat when parents gave their small children a sticker each time they took a “tiny taste” of a disliked vegetable, it gradually changed their attitudes. The children were also willing to eat more of the vegetables-either carrots, celery, cucumber, red pepper, cabbage or sugar snap peas-in laboratory taste tests, the study said.

Researchers randomly assigned(分派)173 families to one of these groups. In one, parents used stickers to reward their children each time they took a tiny sample of a disliked vegetable. A second group of parents used verbal praise. The third group, where parents used no special vegetable-promoting methods, served as a “control”.

Parents in the reward groups offered their children a taste of the “target” vegetable every day of 12 days, Soon after, children in the sticker group were giving higher ratings to the vegetables-and were willing to eat more in the research lab, going from an average of 5 grams at the start to about 10 grams after the 12-day experience. The turnaround also seemed to last, with preschoolers in the sticker group still willing to eat more of the once disliked vegetable three months later.

Why didn’t the verbal praise work? Wardle said the parents’ words may have seemed “insincere” to their children.

小题1:The purpose of writing the passage is       .

A.to introduce a practical method of making children eat vegetables

B.to show the procedure of an experiment on children’s diet

C.to explain why children hate to eat vegetables

D.to present a proper way of vernal praise to parents小题2:The underlined word “backfire” in Paragraph 2 probably means “           ”.

A.shoot from behind the back

B.make a lire in the hackyard

C.produce an unexpected result

D.achieve what was planned小题3:According to the passage, which of the following statements is true?

A.Most children are born to dislike carrots or celery.

B.It remains a question whether rewarding is a good way to get children to eat vegetables.

C.Oral praise wokrs quite well in encouraging children to eat vegetables.

D.Children in the sticker group will never lose interest in eating vegetables.小题4:How did the researchers get their conclusion from the experiment?

A.By comparison.

B.By asking questions.

C.By giving examples,

D.By discussion.小题5:What can we learn from the last paragraph?

A.Children like rewards, not verbal praise.

B.Parents should praise their children in a sincere tone.

C.Children are difficult to inspire.

D.Parents should give up verbal praise.

题型:选择题

行政区域

更多题库