站在任何地方看物体的各个部分都看得很全面。[ ]

题型:填空题

问题:

站在任何地方看物体的各个部分都看得很全面。[    ]

考点:观察物体(角度)
题型:填空题

关于没收财产,下列哪些选项是错误的?()

A.甲受贿100万元,巨额财产来源不明200万元,甲被判处死刑并处没收财产。甲被没收财产的总额至少应为300万元

B.甲抢劫他人汽车被判处死刑并处没收财产。该汽车应上缴国库

C.甲因走私罪被判处无期徒刑并处没收财产。此前所负赌债,经债权人请求应予偿还

D.甲因受贿罪被判有期徒刑十年并处没收财产30万元,因妨害清算罪被判有期徒刑三年并处罚金二万元。没收财产和罚金应当合并执行

题型:填空题

出现双眼左侧视野同向偏盲,且偏盲侧瞳孔直接对光反射消失,其病损部位在()

A.左侧视束

B.右侧视束

C.视交叉

D.左侧视辐射

E.右枕叶

题型:填空题

夏季热的主要临床特征为

A.发热,口渴,便秘,尿少

B.大热,大渴,大汗,脉洪大

C.发热,口渴多饮,多尿,多汗

D.发热,多食多饮,多尿,消瘦

E.长期发热,口渴多饮,多尿,汗闭

题型:填空题

在运用间接证据时,不正确的做法是()

A.只用一个间接证据

B.每个间接证据都查证属实

C.各个间接证据之间不存在着矛盾

D.得出的结论必须是肯定的、唯一的

题型:填空题

For centuries people have been fighting over whether governments should allow trade between countries. There have been, and probably always will be, (1) to the argument. Some people argue that just (2) is best for both the country and the world. Others argue that trade with other countries (3) for some people to make a good living. Both sides are at least (4) .
International trade matters a lot. Its effects on (5) are enormous. Imagine a world in which your country (6) at all with other countries. Imagine what kind of job you would be (7) and what goods you could buy or not buy in such a world.
For the United States, for example, start by imagining that it lived without its (8) a year in imported oil, and cut back on its (9) because the remaining domestic oil and other energy sources were (10) . Producers and consumers in other parts of the economy would (11) if they were suddenly stripped of foreign-made goods like CD players and clothing. On the (12) side, suppose that Boeing could sell airplanes, and farmers could sell their crops, (13) the United States, and that U. S. universities could admit only (14) . In each case there are people who gain and people who lose from (15) international trade. In any case, less or more international trade will have (16) on your career as well as your life.
For years, American companies are often faced with the choice of buying (17) , which are expensive, and foreign-made goods, which are cheap. If the company buys American goods, it may (18) taxpayers by failing to keep prices low. But if it buys foreign goods, it may (19) the jobs of American workers. Recently, Congress has passed a law compelling American companies with government contracts to (20) domestic goods and services.

For centuries people have been fighting over whether governments should allow trade between countries. There have been, and probably always will be, (1) to the argument. Some people argue that just (2) is best for both the country and the world. Others argue that trade with other countries (3) for some people to make a good living. Both sides are at least (4) .
International trade matters a lot. Its effects on (5) are enormous. Imagine a world in which your country (6) at all with other countries. Imagine what kind of job you would be (7) and what goods you could buy or not buy in such a world.
For the United States, for example, start by imagining that it lived without its (8) a year in imported oil, and cut back on its (9) because the remaining domestic oil and other energy sources were (10) . Producers and consumers in other parts of the economy would (11) if they were suddenly stripped of foreign-made goods like CD players and clothing. On the (12) side, suppose that Boeing could sell airplanes, and farmers could sell their crops, (13) the United States, and that U. S. universities could admit only (14) . In each case there are people who gain and people who lose from (15) international trade. In any case, less or more international trade will have (16) on your career as well as your life.
For years, American companies are often faced with the choice of buying (17) , which are expensive, and foreign-made goods, which are cheap. If the company buys American goods, it may (18) taxpayers by failing to keep prices low. But if it buys foreign goods, it may (19) the jobs of American workers. Recently, Congress has passed a law compelling American companies with government contracts to (20) domestic goods and services.

更多题库