大中型工程项目按照子项目组成编制施工成本计划,施工项目总成本分解的顺序为( )。A

题型:单项选择题

问题:

大中型工程项目按照子项目组成编制施工成本计划,施工项目总成本分解的顺序为( )。

A.单项工程→单位工程→分部工程→分项工程

B.单项工程→单位工程→分项工程→分部工程

C.单位工程→单项工程→分部工程→分项工程

D.单位工程→单项工程→分项工程→分部工程

考点:一级建造师建设工程项目管理建设工程项目管理
题型:单项选择题

先天性直肠肛门畸形是世界卫生组织常规监测的先天畸形之一,占消化道畸形的第1位。在对其特点的叙述中,下列错误的是()

A.先天性肛门直肠畸形分型以耻尾线为标准

B.容易合并泌尿生殖系瘘和会阴瘘

C.倒置位摄片对于诊断直肠肛门畸形有重要价值

D.肛门狭窄是高位先天性肛门畸形术后最常见的并发症

E.对于合并泌尿系瘘的患儿术中应常规作膀胱造瘘术以促进窦道愈合

题型:单项选择题

对于脱离工程咨询岗位连续两年以上(含两年)的注册咨询工程师(投资),应做( )处理。

A.警告
B.停止执业
C.注销注册
D.收回执业人名章

题型:单项选择题

申请人不服复议决定的,可以在收到复议决定书之日起( )向人民法院提起诉讼。

A.30日内

B.15日内

C.1个月内

D.3个月内

题型:单项选择题

事物的质与属性的区别在于()。

A.质是内在的,属性是外在的

B.质是客观的,属性是人为确定的

C.在质不变的情况下,某些属性是可以变化的

D.质是个别的,属性是一般的

E.质是偶然的,属性是必然的

题型:单项选择题

There are two factors which determine an individual’s intelligence. The first is the sort of brain he is born with. Human brains differ considerably, some being more capable than others. But no matter how good a brain he has to begin with, an individual will have a low order of intelligence unless he has opportunities to learn. So the second factor is what happens to the individual—the sort of environment in which he is reared. If an individual is handicapped environmentally, it is likely that his brain will fail to develop and he will never attain the level of intelligence of which he is capable.

The importance of environment in determining an individual’s intelligence can be demonstrated by the case of the identical twins, Peter and Mark Being identical, the twins had identical brains at birth, and their growth processes were the same. When the twins were three months old, their parents died, and they were placed in separate foster homes. Peter was reared by parents of low intelligence in an isolated community with poor educational opportunities. Mark was reared in the home of well to do parents who had been to college. He was read to as a child, sent to good schools, and given every opportunity to be stimulated intellectually. This environmental difference continued until the twins were in their late teens, when they were given tests to measure their intelligence. Mark’s IQ was 125, twenty five points higher than the average and fully forty points higher than his identical brother. Given equal opportunities, the twins, having identical brains, would have tested at roughly the same level.

The case of the twins appears to support the conclusion that()

A.individual with identical brains seldom test at same level

B.an individual’s intelligence is determined only by his environment

C.lack of opportunity blocks the growth of intelligence

D.changes of environment produce changes in the structure of the brain

更多题库