图甲表示植物细胞代谢的某些过程,图乙表示光照强度与二氧化碳量的关系。请据图回答问

题型:读图填空题

问题:

图甲表示植物细胞代谢的某些过程,图乙表示光照强度与二氧化碳量的关系。请据图回答问题。(图中数字代表物质,a、b、c代表细胞器)

(1)图甲中,细胞器a为____________,细胞器b中进行的生理过程包括____________两阶段。

(2)图甲中物质④是____________,在_________的情况下,进入c中被分解。⑤代表的物质是_____________。

(3)将一株植物放置于密闭的容器中,用红外测量仪进行测量,测量时间均为1小时,测定的条件和结果如上图乙所示,(数据均在标准状况下测的)据此回答:

①.在15℃、1千勒司光照下,该植物5小时光合作用吸收CO2_______________mol。

②.若该植物在充分光照下积累的有机物都是葡萄糖,在25℃、4千勒克司光照条件下,该植物在充分光照下1小时总共积累葡萄糖______________毫克。

(4)从图中可发现,影响A点和B点光合速率的因素是_____________________。

(5)若给该密闭装置通入C18O2,一段时间后,装置内出现了18O2,请用图解简要说明该过程__________。

考点:光合作用的过程呼吸作用光照强度
题型:读图填空题

下列电子邮件地址名书写正确的是(  )

A.xiaolin@com.sohu

B.xiaolin@sohu.com

C.xiaolin.com.@sohu

D.@xiaolin.com.sohu

题型:读图填空题

阅读下面的文字(11分)

丈夫走后,对于她来说,剩下的只有可怕的孤独和没有目标的生活。尽管医生给丈夫做出了癌症晚期的诊断,斯特拉还是心理准备不足。

他们没有子女,但有共同的事业,总是一起分享生活。现在,大卫走后的第一个圣诞节就要到了,斯特拉越来越深地意识到,现在只有她一个人了。

收音机里播放着圣诞音乐。屋角有一棵圣诞树。离假日不到一个星期了,但她却没心情去装饰圣诞树。突然间,一切都被无边无际的孤独吞没了,斯特拉将脸埋在手中,泪水禁不住流了下来。她怎样才能快些度过圣诞节和那没有止境的冬天呢?这时门铃出乎意料地响了起来,斯特拉不禁发出了一声吃惊的尖叫。现在还有谁会来拜访她?她通过门上的猫眼儿诧异地向外看。

在门外走廊上,站着一个陌生的年轻人,胳膊下夹着一个大大的纸箱。斯特拉鼓起勇气,轻轻地把门开了一条缝。

“泽西夫人?”年轻人问。

她点点头。

“这里有您的一个包裹。”好奇心战胜她心中的谨慎。她推开门,让年轻人进来。年轻人小心地将那个纸箱放在地板上,然后从他的衣袋中取出一个信封。当他把信递给她时,箱子里传出了一个声音。斯特拉吓得跳了起来。那个人抱歉地笑了一下,将箱子盖打开,让她看里面装着什么。那是一条狗! 

年轻人将小狗抱起来,解释说:“这是您的,夫人。它已经有6星期大了,而且已经完全习惯了室内生活。”从黑暗的盒子里解放出来的小狗快活地摇着尾巴。

“我们本应该在圣诞节前夜将它送来。”他边说边试图躲开小狗那湿漉漉舌头的“进攻”。“但是狗舍的工人明天就要放假了。希望你不会介意早一点收到礼物。”惊异已经让她无法清楚地思考什么了。她已经无法说出完整的句子,她结结巴巴地问,“可是……我不知道……我的意思是,谁,谁送的?”年轻人把狗放在地板上,用手指在她举着的信封上点了点:“信里写得很详细。狗7月份就被预订了,它还在娘肚子里时,它就被指定为圣诞节礼物了。” 

所有的解释都在信中。斯特拉看到那熟悉的笔迹时,完全忘了小狗,她强忍住已经满溢的眼泪去读丈夫的信。他是在去世前三星期写这封信的。他说,他已经和狗的主人约定将这只小狗作为他最后一次送给她的圣诞礼物,由他们负责送给她。

她明白了,丈夫送她这只小狗的目的是,让它接替他作为她的伙伴。这是丈夫对她的爱意的表达,希望她坚强地活下去。

小题1:这篇小说在不同的杂志上有不同的题目,有的是“礼物”,有的是“丈夫送来的礼物”,有的是“来自天堂的礼物”。你认为上述题目中哪个最好?为什么?(3分) 

小题2:第二段强调“现在只有她一个人了”,这在情节和主题上分别有什么作用?请结合原文具体回答。(6分)

小题3:某杂志转载这篇小说,将最后一段删掉了。你认为最后一段保留好,还是删掉好。并说明理由。(2分)

题型:读图填空题

门窗洞口木板宜采用()。

A.钢模板

B.塑料木板

C.钢角木模板

D.木模板

题型:读图填空题

In 1930, W. K. Kellogg made what he thought was a sensible decision, grounded in the best economic, social and management theories of the time. Workers at his cereal plant in Battle Greek, Mich. were told to go home two hours earlier, every day for good.
The Depression-era move was hailed in Factory and Industrial Management magazine as the "biggest piece of industrial news since Henry Ford announced his five-dollar-a-day policy." It’s believed that industry and machines would lead to workers’ paradises where all would have less work, more free time, and yet still produce enough to meet their needs.
So what happened Today, instead of working less, our hours have stayed steady or risen- and today many more women work so that families can afford the trappings of suburbia. In effect, workers chose the path of consumption over leisure.
With unemployment at a nine-year high and many workers worded about losing their jobs- or forced to accept cutbacks in pay and benefits -- work is hardly the paradise economists once envisioned.
The modern environment would seem alien to pre-industrial laborers. For centuries, the household -- from farms to "cottage" craftsmen -- was the unit of production. The whole family was part of the enterprise, be it farming, blacksmithing, or baking. "In pre-industrial society, work and family were practically the same thing," says Gillis.
The Industrial Revolution changed all that. Mills and massive iron smelters required ample labor and constant attendance. For the first time, work and family were split. Instead of selling what they produced, workers sold their time. With more people leaving farms to move to cities and factories, labor became a commodity and placed on the market like any other.
Innovation gave rise to an industrial process based on machinery and mass production. The theories of Frederick Taylor, a Philadelphia factory foreman, led to work being broken down into component parts, with each step timed to coldly quantify jobs that skilled craftsmen had worked a lifetime to learn. Workers resented Taylor and his stopwatch, complaining that his focus on process stripped their jobs of creativity and pride, making them irritable. Long before anyone knew what "stress" was, Taylor brought it to the workplace- and without sympathy.
The division of work into components that could be measured and easily taught reached its apex in Ford’s River Rouge Plant in Dearborn, Mich., where the assembly line came of age. To maximize the production lines, businesses needed long hours from their workers. But it was no easy to sell.
Labor leaders fought back with their own propaganda. For more than a century, a key struggle for the labor movement was reducing the amount of time workers had to spend on the job.
Between 1830 and 1930, work hours were cut nearly in half, with economist John Maynard Keynes famously predicting in 1930 that by 2030 a 15-hour workweek would be standard. While work had once been a means to serve God, two centuries of choices and industrialization had turned work into an end in itself, stripped of the spiritual meaning that sustained the Puritans who came ready to tame the wilderness.
By the end of the 1970s, companies were reaching out to spiritually drained workers by offering more engagement while withdrawing the promise of a job for life, as the American economy faced a stiff challenge from cheaper workers abroad. By the 1990s, technology made working from home possible for a growing number of people. Seen as a boon at first, telecommuting and the rapidly proliferating "electronic leash" of cell phones made work inescapable, as employees found themselves on call 24/7. Today, almost half of American workers use computers, cell phones, E-mail, and faxes for work during what is supposed to be nonwork time. Home is no longer a refuge but a cozier extension of the office.
When the stock market bubble burst and the economy fell into its recent recession, workers were forced to re-evaluate their priorities. They want a better quality of life; they’re asking for more flextime to spend with their families.
But there’s still the question of fulfillment. A recent study shows that work doesn’t satisfy workers’ deeper needs. "We expect more and more out of our jobs," says Hunnicutt. "We expect to find wonderful people and experience all around us."

The economist John Maynard Keynes predicted that ______.

A.work hour would be cut nearly in half

B.work hour would be cut nearly in half between 1830 and 1930

C.work hour would be cut in 1930

D.by 2030 a 15-hour workweek would be standard

题型:读图填空题

说明TOSI锅炉吹灰时采用手动操作的方法。

更多题库